Which statement best reflects the principle that a remedy must be capable of redressing the injury?

Which statement best reflects the principle that a remedy must be capable of redressing the injury?

• A. Redressability means the relief must completely remedy all harms.
• B. Redressability is satisfied only when the injury is wholly remedied by relief.
• C. Redressability requires that a court could provide relief that would remove or lessen the injury.
• D. Redressability is irrelevant to standing.

Answer: (C)

Redressability is a core part of standing: for a plaintiff to sue, there must be a potential court remedy that could address the injury they allege. The best statement captures the idea that the court could provide relief that would remove or lessen the injury. It doesn’t require a complete cure of every harm; a remedy that meaningfully reduces or eliminates the injury satisfies redressability. If a court’s relief could not touch the injury at all, or if the injury would continue regardless of what the court does, standing would be lacking. The other options overstate or misstate the requirement by insisting on total remediation or by saying redressability isn’t relevant.

Redressability is a core part of standing: for a plaintiff to sue, there must be a potential court remedy that could address the injury they allege. The best statement captures the idea that the court could provide relief that would remove or lessen the injury. It doesn’t require a complete cure of every harm; a remedy that meaningfully reduces or eliminates the injury satisfies redressability. If a court’s relief could not touch the injury at all, or if the injury would continue regardless of what the court does, standing would be lacking. The other options overstate or misstate the requirement by insisting on total remediation or by saying redressability isn’t relevant.