Which statement about redressability in standing is correct?

Which statement about redressability in standing is correct?

• A. Redressability is satisfied when the plaintiff's injury is likely to be cured by future non-judicial actions.
• B. Redressability is satisfied if the court could fashion relief that would eliminate the injury.
• C. Redressability is not required in standing for constitutional claims.
• D. Redressability is satisfied if a court could remedy the injury by providing relief.

Answer: (D)

Redressability is about whether a court’s relief could address the plaintiff’s injury. For standing to be present, a court must be able to provide remedy that would actually fix or lessen the harm the plaintiff has suffered. The statement that a court could remedy the injury by providing relief captures this idea—the cure has to be within the court’s power to grant. The other ideas miss the point: relying on future non-judicial actions ignores the judiciary’s role in granting relief, and saying the court must eliminate the injury entirely is too strong—redressability looks to whether a court could provide relief that addresses the harm, not necessarily remove it completely. And redressability is required for constitutional claims, so claiming it isn’t needed is incorrect.

Redressability is about whether a court’s relief could address the plaintiff’s injury. For standing to be present, a court must be able to provide remedy that would actually fix or lessen the harm the plaintiff has suffered. The statement that a court could remedy the injury by providing relief captures this idea—the cure has to be within the court’s power to grant.

The other ideas miss the point: relying on future non-judicial actions ignores the judiciary’s role in granting relief, and saying the court must eliminate the injury entirely is too strong—redressability looks to whether a court could provide relief that addresses the harm, not necessarily remove it completely. And redressability is required for constitutional claims, so claiming it isn’t needed is incorrect.